Proportional 3RD (3-rating delegated) voting: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
imported>Homunq
(fix)
imported>Homunq
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


* Voters rate each candidate “Good”, “OK”, or “Bad”. Blanks are filled in by your “Good” candidates.
* Voters rate each candidate “Good”, “OK”, or “Bad”. Blanks are filled in by your “Good” candidates.
** Delegation (rules for filling in blanks left by the voter): Before the election, candidates publicly rate each other “OK” or “Bad”. They may rate another candidate “conditionally OK”, which means “Bad” if the other candidate rates them “Bad”, and “OK” otherwise. If you rank one candidate “Good”, their pre-ratings are used for any other candidates you leave blank. If you rate several candidates “Good”, then your blanks are filled in with the lowest rating any “Good” candidate gave that blank candidate.
** Delegation (rules for filling in blanks left by the voter): Before the election, candidates publicly rate each other “OK” or “Bad”. They may rate another candidate “conditionally OK”, which means “Bad” if the other candidate rates them “Bad”, and “OK” otherwise. Whenever a voter leaves a blank for candidate X, that blank is filled in by whichever rating X got from the majority of candidates the voter ranked "Good", or by "Bad" if there's a tie.
** If a voter rates no candidate “Good” but rates some as “OK” or “Bad”, any blanks they leave are counted as “Bad”.
** If a voter rates no candidate “Good” but rates some as “OK” or “Bad”, any blanks they leave are counted as “Bad”.
**:(Note that the above ballot format and rules are identical to those of [3-2-1 voting], a single-winner, nonproportional voting method.)
**:(Note that the above ballot format and rules are basically the same as those of [3-2-1 voting], a single-winner, nonproportional voting method.)


The basic vote-counting process has 4 steps (based on Single Transferrable Voting):
The basic vote-counting process has 4 steps (based on Single Transferrable Voting):