Proportionality for Solid Coalitions: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (ref formatting with Citer) |
Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
Arguably there is some kind of coalition of 45 voters backing candidates A through J here, and since the largest opposing coalition is 8 voters, D'Hondt would say that the 45-voter coalition ought to win all 5 seats. At that point, one could eliminate all candidates outside the 45-voter coalition (K and L) at which point A through E all are a Hare quota's 1st choice and must all win. This sort of thinking is generally what Condorcet PR methods such as Schulze STV do. |
Arguably there is some kind of coalition of 45 voters backing candidates A through J here, and since the largest opposing coalition is 8 voters, D'Hondt would say that the 45-voter coalition ought to win all 5 seats. At that point, one could eliminate all candidates outside the 45-voter coalition (K and L) at which point A through E all are a Hare quota's 1st choice and must all win. This sort of thinking is generally what Condorcet PR methods such as Schulze STV do. |
||
== See Also == |
|||
* [[Proportional representation]] |
|||
* [[Justified representation]] |
|||
* [[Stable Winner Set]] |
|||
* [[Types of representation]] |
|||
== References == |
== References == |
||