4,193
edits
imported>Araucaria No edit summary |
(Fixing the citation of Russ Paielli's statement of the criterion, and suggesting renaming it to Public acceptability criterion) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{rename|from=Public Acceptability Criterion|to=Public acceptability criterion}}
The Public
As suggested by Russ Paielli]<ref>http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2005-March/113392.html</ref>:
{{definition|By the way, let me suggest another "criterion" for public acceptability. If voters have an election method carefully explained to them for, say, five or ten minutes, then most of them should be able to accurately paraphrase the rules on the first try. And they should also be able to do it days or weeks later, perhaps with only a brief one-minute refresher.}}
Not a bad starting point. Anybody care to add more?
== References ==
<references />
[[Category:Voting system criteria]]
|