Ranked Choice Including Pairwise Elimination: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(Further wording refinements in the intro section.)
(→‎Ballot Robustness: How to handle unranked candidate, affected by how write-in candidates are handled)
Line 28: Line 28:
Also to avoid spoiled ballots, if a voter marks more than one ranking level for the same candidate, only the highest-marked ranking level is used during counting.
Also to avoid spoiled ballots, if a voter marks more than one ranking level for the same candidate, only the highest-marked ranking level is used during counting.


If the voter does not mark any ovals for a candidate, that candidate is ranked at the lowest ranking level, as if the voter marked the oval for the lowest ranking level.
The choice of how to handle a ballot on which a voter does not mark any ovals for a candidate depends on how write-in candidates are handled. If write-in candidates are not allowed, an unmarked candidate can be ranked at the ranking level ''below'' the lowest ranking level shown on the ballot. If write-in candidates are allowed, an unmarked candidate can be ranked ''at'' the lowest ranking level shown on the ballot, and that level also would be used for a write-in candidate whose name does not appear on that ballot.

The ranking level below the lowest ranking level is reserved for write-in candidates whose names do not appear on the ballot being counted.


== Tie breaker ==
== Tie breaker ==