Schulze method: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
imported>RobLa (Link to information on method history) |
|||
Line 162: | Line 162: | ||
This would be true for any [[Condorcet method]]. |
This would be true for any [[Condorcet method]]. |
||
Using the [[first-past-the-post]] system and some other systems, Memphis would have won the election by having the most people, even though Nashville won every simulated pairwise election outright. Using [[Instant-runoff voting]] in this example would result in Knoxville winning, even though more people preferred Nashville over Knoxville. |
Using the [[first-past-the-post]] system and some other systems, Memphis would have won the election by having the most people, even though Nashville won every simulated pairwise election outright. Using [[Instant-runoff voting]] in this example would result in Knoxville winning, even though more people preferred Nashville over Knoxville. |
||
== History == |
|||
See http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2003-December/011477.html |
|||
== Satisfied Criteria == |
== Satisfied Criteria == |