Sequentially Spent Score: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 07:44, 30 November 2019 (view source) 69.172.158.251 (talk) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:16, 30 November 2019 (view source) Dr. Edmonds (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:

	Sequentially Spent Score (SSS), also known as Sequentially Subtracted Score or Unitary Cardinal Voting, is sequential [[Multi-Member System \| Multi-Winner]] [[Cardinal voting systems \| Cardinal voting system]] built on [[Score voting]] ballots. Each winner is that candidate who has the highest sum of score. Between each election rounds the ballots are adjusted such that a candidate cannot influence subsequent rounds more than the score they have remaining. This property of spending score is a particular implementation of [[Vote Unitarity]]		Sequentially Spent Score (SSS), also known as Sequentially Subtracted Score or Unitary Cardinal Voting, is sequential [[Multi-Member System \| Multi-Winner]] [[Cardinal voting systems \| Cardinal voting system]] built on [[Score voting]] ballots. Each winner is that candidate who has the highest sum of score. Between each election rounds the ballots are adjusted such that a candidate cannot influence subsequent rounds more than the score they have remaining. This property of spending score is a particular implementation of [[Vote Unitarity]]. [[Sequentially Spent Score]] was invented by [[Keith Edmonds]] and [[Vote Unitarity]] was defined to describe this underlying theory.

	==Procedure==		==Procedure==