Jump to content

STAR voting: Difference between revisions

Line 90:
6 B:4
 
Scores are A 17 B 24 D 10, with B pairwise beating A 6 to 5. So the Score and STAR winner is B. But taking into account that those who preferred B over A all have their favorite a maximum of a 4 out of 5, if we weight their runoff votes at 80%, then now B loses the runoff 4.8 to 5. So A wins under modified STAR.<ref>https://forum.electionscience.org/t/star-but-with-weak-votes-in-the-runoff-when-voters-dont-give-any-candidate-the-top-score/615/5</ref></blockquote>[[InstantVoters Runoffcould Normalizedalso Ratings|IRNR]]be isallowed relatedto indicate they want their rated preference to STARbe used in the samerunoff, wayrather thatthan [[IRV]]ranked preferences i.e. a voter who scored the two candidates a 5/5 and 3/5 would give 1 vote to the first candidate and 0.6 votes to the second. This is related to [[Top-twoRated runoffpairwise preference ballot#Rated or ranked preference]], and the vote-counting can be done in the same way.
 
[[Instant Runoff Normalized Ratings|IRNR]] is related to STAR in the same way that [[IRV]] is related to [[Top-two runoff]].
 
Given that STAR is an automatic form of Score voting + Runoff, one can also create an automatic "[[Approval voting]] + Runoff" method by allowing voters to rank or score candidates, and then indicate an [[Condorcet//Approval|approval threshold]] for a particular rank or score such that they'd approve all candidates at that same rank or score or a higher rank or score, and then use the ranks or scores to figure out which of the two most approved candidates is preferred by a majority.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.