Jump to content

Bucklin voting: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Fixed spelling of name.)
No edit summary
Line 86:
 
Fallback voting is equivalent to the [[Expanding Approvals Rule]] in the single-winner case under certain conditions.<blockquote>Remark 3 [...] For k = 1 and under linear orders for all but a subset of equally least preferred candidates applying the tweak in Remark 2 leads to the EAR [Expanding Approvals Rule] being equivalent to the Fallback voting rule (Brams and Sanver, 2009). <ref name="Aziz Lee 20172">{{cite web | last=Aziz | first=Haris | last2=Lee | first2=Barton | title=The Expanding Approvals Rule: Improving Proportional Representation and Monotonicity | website=arXiv.org | date=2017-08-25 | url=https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.07580v2 | access-date=2020-01-30|page=19}}</ref></blockquote>
 
 
== Related systems ==
 
There are a number of variations of Bucklin voting such as [[Iterated bucklin]]. [[Majority Judgment]] is a cardinal voting system which is similar.
 
== Notes ==
765

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.