Jump to content

Iterated Bucklin: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 23:
== Multi-winner generalization ==
 
The same procedure can be generalized to the election of a number of winning candidates. At the first stage, all candidates with at least a quota of support (first preferences) are declared elected, and a [[Quota#Hare_quota | Hare quota]] of supportballot weight is proportionallyallocated subtractedto the winners from the relevant ballots. The remaining places (should there be any) are filled by applying the same iterative procedure to the remaining (de-weighted) ballots to elect the next winner. Ballots are again de-weighted (with a quota of support being subtracted from all ballots having approved of the PW as of the count’s end) and the count begins again, until all eligible places are filled.
 
=== Surplus Handling ===
 
If viewed as a [[Cardinal_voting_systems#Sequential_Proportional_Methods | Sequential Cardinal Method]] then [[Surplus_Handling#Fractional_Surplus_Handling | Fractional Surplus Handling]] can be used. Other mechanisms like those used in [[Single transferable vote]] are also possible.
 
== Ties and Cycles ==
765

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.