Talk:IRV Prime: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 71:
--[[User:Marcosb|Marcosb]] ([[User talk:Marcosb|talk]]) 17:20, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
There's also P4 (realized from offline discussion with Marcus):
{{ballots|
abc: 3N + 2
acb: 2N
bca: 3N
bac: 2N + 1
cab: 3N
cba: 2N}}
Which has some different truths:
* For all N, a wins in IRV (c is eliminated, a wins against b)
* For N=1, a is the condorcet winner (& thus the 1st premise, that c becomes the condorcet, doesn't hold)
* For N>=2, a '''does not win''' in IRV-Prime (& thus the 2nd premise, that a wins, doesn't hold)
--[[User:Marcosb|Marcosb]] ([[User talk:Marcosb|talk]]) 00:57, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
I've transposed the examples on the page you listed (elections 3-5) [[https://github.com/marcosb/vse-sim/blob/master/methods.py to code]], but not sure what I'm looking for:
| |||