Defeat strength: Difference between revisions
→List of measures
No edit summary |
|||
Line 12:
** Example method: Tideman originally defined [[Ranked Pairs]] as a margins method.<ref name="Tideman2">{{Cite journal |last=Tideman |first=T. N. |date=1987-09-01 |title=Independence of clones as a criterion for voting rules |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00433944 |journal=Social Choice and Welfare |language=en |volume=4 |issue=3 |pages=185–206 |doi=10.1007/BF00433944 |issn=1432-217X}}</ref>
* '''pairwise (non)opposition''': number of votes for W≥L, or equivalently 1 - votes for L > W
** Gives even less strategic incentive than wv
** Strong intuitive appeal (pick the candidate opposed by the least voters)
** Violates [[plurality criterion]].
*** A complete unknown can win with no real support, just because everyone forgot to rank them on their ballot.
** Example method: [[MMPO]].
* '''Relative margins''': Defeat strength = margin ÷ (votes for W≠L)
| |||