Jump to content

Prefer Accept Reject voting: Difference between revisions

imported>Homunq
imported>Homunq
Line 11:
== Criteria compliance ==
 
PAR voting passes the [[majority criterion]], the [[mutual majority criterion]], [[Local independence of irrelevant alternatives]] (under the assumption of fixed "honest" ratings for each voter for each candidate), [[Independence of clone alternatives]], [[Monotonicity]], [[polytime]], [[resolvability]], and the [[later-no-help criterion]].
 
There are a few criteria for which it does not pass as such, but where it passes related but weaker criteria. These include:
Line 20:
 
* It fails the [[participation criterion]] but passes the [[semi-honest participation criterion]].
 
* It fails but, as shown in the center squeeze scenario below, in a 3-candidate scenario it does at least offer viable strategies to each of the subgroups of the majority that prefers X>Y, such that either of the potentially-strategic subgroups has a strategy to ensure Y loses, even if the other potentially-strategic subgroup does not maximally cooperate. ("Subgroup" in this sense is characterized by whether they prefer Z over or under both. The assumption is that the "honest" vote is Support, Accept, Reject in some order for the three candidates, or only Support and Reject in case of indifference between two of them. This guarantees that any X>Z>Y voters will maximally cooperate under honesty, so this subgroup is not potentially-strategic.)
 
* It fails O(N) [[summability]], but can get that summability with two-pass tallying (first determine who's eliminated, then retally).
 
* It may pass the majority Condorcet loser criterion (?).
 
* It fails the [[later-no-help criterion]], but passes if there is at least one candidate above the elimination thresholds (which is always true, for instance, if there are some three candidates who get 3 different ratings on every ballot).
 
It fails the [[consistency criterion]], the [[Condorcet loser criterion]], [[reversibility]], the [[majority loser criterion]], the [[Strategy-free criterion]], and the [[later-no-harm criterion|later-no-harm]] and [[later-no-help criterion|later-no-help]] criteria.
Anonymous user
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.