Difference between revisions of "Score voting"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
252 bytes removed ,  15 years ago
no edit summary
(→‎Voting: qualified)
'''Range voting''', or '''ratings summation''', or '''average votingrating''', or '''cardinal ratings''' is a [[voting system]] used for single-seat elections.
(It couldcan also be used for multi-seat elections, but thatnot iswith aproportional poor idearesults.)
since it would lead to massive proportionality failures, where, e.g. a 51%
Whig electorate could elect a 100% Whig slate of winners.)
It is also used on the web - for rating movies (Internet Movie Database), comments (Kuro5hin), and many other things - and something very similar to it is used
in the Olympics to award gold medals to gymnasts.
about those candidates.
Range voting satisfies the [[monotonicity criterion]], the [[participation criterion]], the [[Consistency Criterion]], the [[summability criterion]], the [[Favorite Betrayal criterion]], [[Independence of irrelevant alternatives]], the [[Non-compulsory support criterion]] and the [[IndependenceStrategic nomination|independence of clones criterion]].
Range voting is a [[Smith method]] and elects the [[Smith winner]] if one exists.
== Counting the Votes ==
is the winner.
(Another method of counting is to find the [[median]] score of each candidate, and elect the candidate with the highest median score - see [[Median Ratings]]. Because strategic voting will typically lead to a vast number of candidates with the same median, a rulesecondary measure to resolve ties is needed. Using the median is much more complicated than using the average.)
Anonymous user
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu