Jump to content

Talk:Majority: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
imported>Wegerje
mNo edit summary
imported>Wegerje
No edit summary
Line 6:
 
:::I think the way you did it in the div box looks good. I was thinking of adding a CSS style for the election model notation, but if you beat me to it, I won't complain. You could just play with putting the election models in div boxes, or use your personal stylesheet: [[User:Wegerje/monobook.css]] to play with it until it's ready to be copied. [[User:DanKeshet|DanKeshet]] 22:04, 17 Mar 2005 (PST)
 
:::: I'll need to learn a new skill, eh!
 
::'''As for criterion/criteria.''' Ok, I looked up "Generalized Condorcet criterion" on google and it appears to be common usage. It struck me strangely, but that's my lack of education. [[User:Wegerje|Wegerje]] 09:29, 17 Mar 2005 (PST)
Line 11 ⟶ 13:
:::Aah, I didn't understand that you were talking about criterion vs. criteria. I guess we should set up redirects so that people searching for "criteria' will find it. I'll look at that stuff tomorrow. [[User:DanKeshet|DanKeshet]] 22:04, 17 Mar 2005 (PST)
 
::::'''No not that,''' although that may be an issue in itself. I didn't realize that people actually called something the "Generalized Condorcet ciriterion" or the "Montonicity criterion". I didn't realize that "criterion" was a part of the name and that people used it in common reference. My Bad, as bloggers say.
Anonymous user
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.