Revision as of 19:20, 15 December 2016 (view source) imported>Homunq (→‎Properties) ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:21, 15 December 2016 (view source) imported>Homunq (→‎Properties) Newer edit →
Line 19: It satisfies the [[mutual majority criterion]] as long as any member of the mutual majority set of candidates is among the 3 semifinalists. In practice, this is almost guaranteed to be the case. Steps 1 and 3 satisfy the [[later no-harm criterion]]. Thus, ~~so that~~ the only strategic reason not to add any "acceptable" ratings would be if your favorite was one of the two most-rejected semifinalists but also was able to beat the least-rejected semifinalist in step 3. This combination of weak and strong is unlikely to happen in real life, and even less likely to be predictable enough a priori to be a basis for strategy. == Examples ==

3-2-1 voting (view source)