Arrow's impossibility theorem: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (wikipedia template) |
Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 19:
With a narrower definition of “irrelevant alternatives” which excludes those candidates in the [[Smith set]], some [[Condorcet method]]s meet all the criteria.
==Statement==
No [[Ordinal Voting]] system can be designed that always satisfies these three "fairness" criteria:
# [[Pareto Criterion]]
# [[Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives]]
# There is neither "dictator" nor "prophet": no single voter possesses the power or the knowledge to always determine the group's preference.
==Systems which violate only one of Arrow's criteria==
| |||