Jump to content

3-2-1 voting: Difference between revisions

→‎Delegated 3-2-1: simplify delegation — one only (easier for counting)
imported>Homunq
(at Steve's suggestion)
imported>Homunq
(→‎Delegated 3-2-1: simplify delegation — one only (easier for counting))
Line 15:
In this method, each candidate can pre-rate other candidates "OK", "conditionally OK", or "bad". If they do not explicitly pre-rate, they are considered to rate all others "conditionally OK". Once all ratings have been submitted, all "conditionally OK" ratings are turned to "Bad" if the rating coming the other way is "Bad", and to "OK" otherwise. Candidate ratings are public information.
 
When a voter leaves a candidate X blank/unrated, and rates exactly one other candidate Y as "Good", that counts as rating X as "OK" if strictly more than half of the voter's favorite candidatesY rated X "OK". Otherwise it counts as rating X "OKBad".
 
For example, if I rated bothonly Aurelio and Amy "good" and left Beth and Chung blank; and Aurelio rated Beth and Chung as "OK", while Amy rated Beth "OK" and Chung as "Bad", then I'd count as ratinggiving Beththose "OK"ratings. (2/2If of myI'd favoritesalso rated herAmy "OKgood"), andthen Chungmy "Bad"blank (1/2rating for Beth would count as "OKbad"s, whichno ismatter notwhat ''more''Amy thanand Aurelio half)said.
 
=== Undelegated 3-2-1 ===
Anonymous user
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.