Majority: Difference between revisions
→Notes
No edit summary |
(→Notes) |
||
Line 113:
== Notes ==
▲== [[ISDA]] implies several of the criteria mentioned above. When there is a mutual majority and a minority with a preference among the mutual majority's preferred candidates, the ISDA-based reasoning for deciding who to elect is to eliminate everyone not in the mutual majority, check if there is a new mutual majority set, and then repeat. Taking the above example ==
: 31 A > B > C
:
: 40 C > B > A
40 C > B</blockquote>The 31 A>B>C and 29 B>C>A voters fuse into one coalition with A gone, and so there is now a majority who put B as their 1st choice, and because ISDA implies the [[Majority criterion|majority criterion]], B wins.
[[Category:Voting theory]]
{{fromwikipedia}}
| |||