Symmetrical ICT: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

After this description and definition of Symmetrical ICT, I'll say a few words of what it implies for the compatibility of FBC and Condorcet's Criterion.

Line 75:

Line 73:

And that genuine legitimacy is the reason why Symmetrical ICT meets FBC (unlike traditional unimproved Condorcet).

So: Improved Condorcet versions, including ICT and Symmetrical ICT, meet the ~~CondorcetCr~~ ~~iterion~~, when it is defined more legitmately.

So: Improved Condorcet versions, including ICT and Symmetrical ICT, meet the Condorcet Criterion, when it is defined more legitmately.

Likewise, then, it can be said that FBC and the Condorcet Criterion are compatible, contrary to popular belief.

Though it's defined elsewhere in electowiki, under its own name, I'd like to state my definition of FBC here. This definition is ~~given~~ at the FBC article in electowiki, as an alternative definition of FBC. But it's the FBC definition that I now prefer, and it's what I now mean when I say FBC.

Though it's defined elsewhere in electowiki, under its own name, I'd like to state my definition of FBC here. This definition is also linked to at the FBC article in electowiki, as an alternative definition of FBC. But it's the FBC definition that I now prefer, and it's what I now mean when I say FBC.