4,193
edits
Talk:Advocacy: Difference between revisions
→Electoral reform merge: new section
m (RobLa moved page Talk:Activism to Talk:Advocacy: Renaming the page rather than the category) |
(→Electoral reform merge: new section) |
||
Line 1:
== Subpage or namespace ==
I've been thinking about both how [[w:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]] works, as well as how other wikis work as I've been structuring the [[Activism]] section (which, as you can see from the discussion over at [[:Category_talk:Advocacy]], could get renamed to "Advocacy"). My current bias is to build out a set of <nowiki>Activism/*</nowiki> subpages (e.g. [[Activism/Canada]], [[Activism/United States]], [[Activism/Mexico]], [[Activism/California]], [[Activism/Oregon]]) where the page name is prefixed by "<nowiki>Activism</nowiki>", and then we get to use MediaWiki's subpage functionality to get automatic navigation back to the parent [[Activism]] page. However, I'm a little unsure about how pedantic we want to be about maintaining a strict hierarchy (e.g., having [[Activism/North America/United States/Pacific/California]] instead of [[Activism/California]]. My bias there would be to keep it simple (and just have [[Activism/California]]. Thoughts? -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 20:52, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
== Electoral reform merge ==
I copied the contents of the [[Advocacy]] page to [[Electoral reform]], then better incorporated the links/etc into a clearer article. This page is the top of the "Advocacy" (or "Activism") hierarchy on this wiki, but perhaps the bulk of the content on this page can be redirected to [[electoral reform]] in some way. Thoughts? -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 17:22, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
| |||