Talk:Arrow's impossibility theorem: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
Line 83:
::::: I think Kristomun is talking about something like a 3-candidate Condorcet cycle, where no matter who Score elects, if one candidate drops out, then if voters normalize between the two remaining candidates, then you get majority rule. [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 22:47, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
:::::: Pretty much. By "relative scale" I mean in the sense of Balinski and Laraki: an absolute scale is where the grades (or ratings) mean the same thing for everybody, a relative one is where what ratings you provide depend on what candidates are running. I don't know of a published proof, but it seems obvious, just follow [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy]]'s suggestion: you set up an election where there's a Condorcet cycle and no matter who wins, if another candidate drops out then winner loses the resulting majority election. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 23:25, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
| |||