Talk:Asset voting: Difference between revisions
→Content from deleted Wikipedia article: respond to User:RobLa
(→Content from deleted Wikipedia article: thanks for the quick reply! what was the timestamp/oldid of the enwiki version?) |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (→Content from deleted Wikipedia article: respond to User:RobLa) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 87:
::: Thanks for the prompt response, [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]]. I appreciate your taking the time to pull things that were aggressively deleted from English Wikipedia (enwiki). I'm an enwiki admin too, so I can at least see the old revisions. What is the oldid and/or timestamp of the revision you pulled this from? We might want to cite the [[w:Wayback Machine|Wayback Machine]] version of the article as the public source. Ultimately, someone should probably do a plagiarism-free rewrite of the parts we want to keep. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 19:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
:::: It looks like I got it from timestamp 20090918105700 before one of its deletions. [https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asset_voting Wayback Machine doesn't seem to go back that far]. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 05:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
== Asset voting discussion over on reddit ==
[[User:Psephomancy]] started a very interesting discussion about [[asset voting]] over on the EndFPTP subreddit. The discussion: https://www.reddit.com/r/EndFPTP/comments/eniyfl/i_dont_understand_why_anyone_likes_asset_voting/
I haven't had the chance to really read through it, and wrap my brain around the pros and the cons, but it looks like it prompted many great explanations of asset voting that could be used to improve this article. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 20:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
| |||