Talk:Asset voting: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
m (link fix) |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 13:
I discovered all of this looking when I was replying to [https://www.reddit.com/r/EndFPTP/comments/au0nll/condorcet_systems_seem_a_bit_ambiguous_to_me/ a thread on reddit]. As I'm about to say there, I think this method is really interesting as a way of dealing with crowded primaries. However, I'd like to use preferred terminology to refer to it, and it appears as though "Delegated voting" is winning out over "Asset voting" as the preferred term. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 04:38, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
: "Delegated voting" has lots of meanings, though, including Liquid Democracy, SODA, PLACE, etc. Sounds like Homunq moved it there out of desperation, not because anyone actually calls it that.
: Also it's not clear to me why Asset doesn't suffer from center-squeeze effect, since it seems that center candidates with low numbers of votes will be compelled to give them to other candidates nearby. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 02:49, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
| |||