4,193
edits
Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(Cleaning up the topic headlines (adding headlines where necessary). Mainly formatting; no new comments from me (yet)) |
||
Line 1:
== Merge with "Category:Cardinal voting methods" ==
Should this just be merged into [[:Category:Cardinal voting methods]]? — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 05:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Line 15 ⟶ 17:
— [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 17:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
== Favorite betrayal and cardinal methods ==
Some of the points made about cardinal methods on this page seem to ignore STAR Voting. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STAR_voting#Properties Wikipedia] says that STAR fails the participation criterion, and the STAR Voting website has an [https://www.starvoting.us/farewell_to_pass_fail article] mentioning that STAR fails Favorite Betrayal. So maybe a distinction should be made between "classical/pure cardinal" methods, such as Approval and Score, and "semi-cardinal" methods like STAR. I think this rangevoting [https://rangevoting.org/StarVoting.html article] also has examples featuring other criterion failures that don't occur in Approval or Score.
Line 24 ⟶ 27:
:: Yes, but several of the statements on the page are inaccurate when talking about any cardinal method other than Approval or Score. [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 06:45, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
== Arrow and cardinal methods ==
[[User:RobLa]] and [[User:Dr. Edmonds]], I think this edit (https://electowiki.org/w/index.php?title=Cardinal_voting_systems&curid=77&diff=8724&oldid=8653) is likely to be controversial, so I'd like to discuss it with both of you. This is the part that is at stake:
: <code>Unlike ordinal voting, [[W:Arrow's Impossibility Theorem|Arrow's Impossibility Theorem]] does not apply to pure cardinal methods. Furthermore, all pure cardinal methods satisfy the participation criterion. </code>
|