Talk:Center squeeze: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 14:40, 18 December 2023 (view source) Kristomun (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:42, 18 December 2023 (view source) Kristomun (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 30:		Line 30:

	: I don't think there's a formalized "center squeeze criterion". But as an indication, you could try to see if your IRV version elects Center in every configuration of the [[Left, Center, Right]] scenario; that is, all possible elections with x < 50%, y < 50%, x + y > 50%, where x, y, z are defined as on that page. [[User:Kristomun\|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun\|talk]]) 14:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)		: I don't think there's a formalized "center squeeze criterion". But as an indication, you could try to see if your IRV version elects Center in every configuration of the [[Left, Center, Right]] scenario; that is, all possible elections with x < 50%, y < 50%, x + y > 50%, where x, y, z are defined as on that page. [[User:Kristomun\|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun\|talk]]) 14:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

			: Presumably, Center should also be elected if any of the candidates is cloned. This could exclude methods that check a fixed number of candidates to otherwise obtain Condorcet compliance, but it would also be more difficult to test. [[User:Kristomun\|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun\|talk]]) 14:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)