Talk:Center squeeze: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<blockquote>Systems which can do either well or poorly in a center squeeze situation include most graded Bucklin systems and score voting. </blockquote> Under what circumstan...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Under what circumstances do they not do well? — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 03:44, 6 February 2019 (UTC) |
Under what circumstances do they not do well? — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 03:44, 6 February 2019 (UTC) |
||
I think center squeeze is an interesting criterion & it's valuable to compare systems which allow it vs disallow it. Some questions: |
|||
* Is there an existing criterion that is a superset of preventing center squeeze? What I mean is, is there a criterion that if met by a voting system, center squeeze can never happen? |
|||
* If not, is "exhibits center squeeze" worthy of a criterion? |
|||
* Lastly, whether or not it's called out as a criterion, what voting systems do & don't exhibit it? |
|||
Revision as of 19:52, 20 July 2021
Systems which can do either well or poorly in a center squeeze situation include most graded Bucklin systems and score voting.
Under what circumstances do they not do well? — Psephomancy (talk) 03:44, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
I think center squeeze is an interesting criterion & it's valuable to compare systems which allow it vs disallow it. Some questions:
- Is there an existing criterion that is a superset of preventing center squeeze? What I mean is, is there a criterion that if met by a voting system, center squeeze can never happen?
- If not, is "exhibits center squeeze" worthy of a criterion?
- Lastly, whether or not it's called out as a criterion, what voting systems do & don't exhibit it?