Talk:Condorcet paradox: Difference between revisions
→Why a tie must be a tie in politics
Line 12:
If the 11 supporters of A really had a second choice and it was B or C using IRV… same result.
However, IRV would elect A if 3 supporters moved over to C (voter betrayal to succeed). Obviously, facing defeat, A has every reason to try, but supporters of A may not. Rather than do that calculated 3 vote move to make a tie, supporters of A should only need to change 3 of their votes to A>C. No betrayal.
3 A>C▼
8 A
▲3 A>C
7 B>A
Line 22:
5 C>B
It's a paradox. It wasn't before, but it is now. And based on these votes, C deserves to be in the conversation.
[[User:RalphInOttawa|RalphInOttawa]] ([[User talk:RalphInOttawa|talk]]) 17:28, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
|