Talk:Condorcet paradox: Difference between revisions

However, IRV would elect A if 3 supporters moved over to C (voter betrayal to succeed). Obviously, facing defeat, A has every reason to try, but supporters of A may not. Rather than do that calculated 3 vote move to make a tie, supporters of A should only need to change 3 of their votes to A>C. No betrayal.

It's a paradox. It wasn't before, but it is now. And based on these votes, C deserves to be in the conversation. TheA realshouldn't focus shouldeven be onlooking for a votingtie. All A needs to win is one more vote. Get 1 vote from B>A to become A>B, or 1 vote from C>B to become C>A>B. Candidates need to prove they are better than the rest. That’s what voters want to see in an election. I think if you find a paradox, accept it as a tie.