Talk:Favorite betrayal criterion: Difference between revisions
Talk:Favorite betrayal criterion (view source)
Revision as of 16:39, 13 December 2023
, 5 months ago→A better IRV needs a better example.
(→A better IRV needs a better example.: new section) |
|||
Line 16:
I have an improved version of IRV that does not fail in the example given.
There is no need for any of the 10 supporters of A>B>C>D to change their votes. I have an example (#11) on my spreadsheet demonstrator that turns a candidate’s loss into a three way tie that requires a random draw to win. That’s less rewarding than the outright win granted in IRV. Therefore, I would like to claim that although it can still fail, it is a better version of IRV.
(Is it still considered IRV? See the link on my user page).
[[User:RalphInOttawa|RalphInOttawa]] ([[User talk:RalphInOttawa|talk]]) 09:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
| |||