Talk:Favorite betrayal criterion: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
imported>R.H. (Is it true that all Condorcet methods fail FBC?) |
imported>KVenzke No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
12.73.128.232 changed the article from saying that most or all Condorcet methods fail FBC to claiming that all Condorcet methods fail. |
12.73.128.232 changed the article from saying that most or all Condorcet methods fail FBC to claiming that all Condorcet methods fail. |
||
Is it proven that all Condorcet methods fail FBC? |
Is it proven that all Condorcet methods fail FBC? |
||
That was me (12.73.128.232). On the EM list I recently was able to show that a method that satisfies Condorcet necessarily has situations in which changing an equal ranking A=B to a strict ranking A>B on some ballots increases the probability that the winner is either A or B. This incentive isn't compatible with FBC. [[User:KVenzke|Kevin Venzke]] 07:02, 7 Jul 2005 (PDT) |
|||
Revision as of 14:02, 7 July 2005
12.73.128.232 changed the article from saying that most or all Condorcet methods fail FBC to claiming that all Condorcet methods fail. Is it proven that all Condorcet methods fail FBC?
That was me (12.73.128.232). On the EM list I recently was able to show that a method that satisfies Condorcet necessarily has situations in which changing an equal ranking A=B to a strict ranking A>B on some ballots increases the probability that the winner is either A or B. This incentive isn't compatible with FBC. Kevin Venzke 07:02, 7 Jul 2005 (PDT)