Talk:IRV Prime: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Running through the IRV-Prime steps, first we do classic IRV, which eliminates C & finds winners={A}: |
Running through the IRV-Prime steps, first we do classic IRV, which eliminates C & finds winners={A}: |
||
{{ballots| |
|||
A: 60 |
A: 60 |
||
B: 30 |
B: 30}} |
||
We now see if any candidate can win against A (we know B can't), i.e. WinnersPrime={C}: |
We now see if any candidate can win against A (we know B can't), i.e. WinnersPrime={C}: |
||
{{ballots| |
|||
C: 55 |
C: 55 |
||
A: 35 |
A: 35}} |
||
And as such C is the winner in IRV-Prime; this is a classic case of A=Rock, B=Scissors, C=Paper; if I phrase it to you as "suppose B & C voters were to go up against A: which candidate should they stand behind?" |
And as such C is the winner in IRV-Prime; this is a classic case of A=Rock, B=Scissors, C=Paper; if I phrase it to you as "suppose B & C voters were to go up against A: which candidate should they stand behind?" then it becomes clear what IRV prime is trying to do (i.e. higher preferences of a candidate that can win) |
||
--[[User:Marcosb|Marcosb]] ([[User talk:Marcosb|talk]]) 22:39, 3 August 2021 (UTC) |
--[[User:Marcosb|Marcosb]] ([[User talk:Marcosb|talk]]) 22:39, 3 August 2021 (UTC) |
||