Talk:Parliamentary government formation: Difference between revisions
Talk:Parliamentary government formation (view source)
Revision as of 20:11, 19 January 2022
, 2 years ago→Rename to "Government"
(→Rename to "Government": I'll be renaming this soon, either to Government or to User:Dr. Edmonds/Government formation, barring a compelling counterargument. This wiki needs a "Government" article more than it needs a "Government formation" article.) |
Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 36:
:: I forgot about being referred to as "you Condorcet people" and then almost immediately misspelled "Condorcet" as "Condorset" just to emphasize the point that you truly don't think that Condorcet methods (or the [[Condorcet criterion]]) are important. My comments from 2020 still stand; this is not a good article as written. Either we move this page to [[Government]] or we move it to [[User:Dr. Edmonds/Government formation]], unless someone weighs in with a compelling counterargument (preferrably someone other than [[User:Dr. Edmonds]], since a different [[Project:electowikian|electowikian]] oould break the stalemate, and [[User:Dr. Edmonds]] has made their position clear). I still maintain that this wiki needs a "Government" article more than it needs a "Government formation" article. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 09:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
::: [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]], [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]], or [[User:Marylander | Marylander]], do any of you have opinions on if the processes and electoral methods for forming a government after the general election deserves a page? I really only know about the one system currently there so it would be great if this page could be expanded. --[[User:Dr. Edmonds|Dr. Edmonds]] ([[User talk:Dr. Edmonds|talk]]) 20:11, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
| |||