Talk:Preferential voting: Difference between revisions

From electowiki
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "Ordinal voting is the proper term. We should use this at the page title")
 
(respond to User:Dr. Edmonds)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Ordinal voting is the proper term. We should use this at the page title
Ordinal voting is the proper term. We should use this at the page title --[[User:Dr. Edmonds|Dr. Edmonds]] ([[User talk:Dr. Edmonds|talk]]) 17:15, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

: If so, preferential voting ought to be a redirect page towards this page. I'd probably also suggest using "rated voting" as a redirect to "cardinal voting". [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 17:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

"Preferential voting" is far more common and I'm not sure why it would be any less "proper", so I think it should stay as is. It's essentially a disambig page right now anyway, and maybe should be more concise like [[w:Preferential_voting|Wikipedia's disambig page]]. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 19:53, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:53, 27 February 2020

Ordinal voting is the proper term. We should use this at the page title --Dr. Edmonds (talk) 17:15, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

If so, preferential voting ought to be a redirect page towards this page. I'd probably also suggest using "rated voting" as a redirect to "cardinal voting". BetterVotingAdvocacy (talk) 17:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

"Preferential voting" is far more common and I'm not sure why it would be any less "proper", so I think it should stay as is. It's essentially a disambig page right now anyway, and maybe should be more concise like Wikipedia's disambig page. — Psephomancy (talk) 19:53, 27 February 2020 (UTC)