Talk:Rob Richie: Difference between revisions
→Is Rob Richie a voting theorist?
(→Is Rob Richie a voting theorist?: yes, he's a theorist. Not one that I agree with, but he isn't alone here.... :-) He's ALSO an activist: Category:Election methods activists) |
Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 4:
Is it justifiable to refer to Rob Ritchie as a Voting Theorist? Would it be better to have a category for Lobbyists or campaigners? --[[User:Dr. Edmonds|Dr. Edmonds]] ([[User talk:Dr. Edmonds|talk]]) 05:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
:Yes, it's justifiable. It's my understanding that [[STAR voting]] was invented during a conversation with him. Regardless of whether anyone here agrees with him, he has theories about voting methods, and he's followed through on his theories in a big way. All that said, it could be useful to build out [[:Category:Electoral reform activists]] (with both of us members, in addition to Richie) because many of us act on our not-so-humble opinions, and the "activist" title would be more appropriate than "theorist" if we had to choose one. However, it sure seems to me that there are very few "pure theorists" in this space, and both seem like appropriate terms to apply to many of us. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 06:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
:: OK Point taken. I forgot about his involvement in the development of STAR. There are for sure people on who are [[Voting theorist]] and not [[:Category:Electoral reform activists]] like [[Piotr Skowron]]. There are likely many many of the opposite who are activists but not theorists. I have been trying to keep the [[Voting theorist]] page updated and consistent with [[Category:Voting_theorists]]. The additional purpose of [[Voting theorist]] page is to have a quick reference for "What did that theorist do?". Hopefully this is a worthwhile page. It also documents several people who are noteworthy but do not have a page of their own. --[[User:Dr. Edmonds|Dr. Edmonds]] ([[User talk:Dr. Edmonds|talk]]) 16:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
| |||