Talk:Schulze STV

Revision as of 10:41, 18 March 2020 by Kristomun (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Schulze STV's party list case is not D'Hondt because Schulze STV passes the Droop proportionality criterion, which is quota-based. No divisor methods pass quota criteria, so S...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Schulze STV's party list case is not D'Hondt because Schulze STV passes the Droop proportionality criterion, which is quota-based. No divisor methods pass quota criteria, so Schulze STV's party list case can't be any of them. Most likely, it is LR-Droop, but I haven't proven that. Kristomun (talk) 10:41, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Return to "Schulze STV" page.