Talk:Vote For and Against: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
imported>R.H. (vote for and against as many as you like) |
imported>KVenzke No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Would "vote for and against as many as you like" be a worse idea? This would satisfy FBC and I guess if the version with the 50% rule is used, burying wouldn't be as big an issue as with average ratings (nothing to brag about though). --[[User:R.H.|R.H.]] 09:54, 5 Aug 2005 (PDT) |
Would "vote for and against as many as you like" be a worse idea? This would satisfy FBC and I guess if the version with the 50% rule is used, burying wouldn't be as big an issue as with average ratings (nothing to brag about though). --[[User:R.H.|R.H.]] 09:54, 5 Aug 2005 (PDT) |
||
With the 50% rule, it wouldn't satisfy FBC. In either version, you'd have the problem of what to do when all candidates are disqualified. [[User:KVenzke|Kevin Venzke]] 10:39, 6 Aug 2005 (PDT) |
Revision as of 17:39, 6 August 2005
Would "vote for and against as many as you like" be a worse idea? This would satisfy FBC and I guess if the version with the 50% rule is used, burying wouldn't be as big an issue as with average ratings (nothing to brag about though). --R.H. 09:54, 5 Aug 2005 (PDT)
With the 50% rule, it wouldn't satisfy FBC. In either version, you'd have the problem of what to do when all candidates are disqualified. Kevin Venzke 10:39, 6 Aug 2005 (PDT)