Talk:Vote splitting: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) m (Psephomancy moved page Talk:Split vote to Talk:Vote splitting: Wikipedia has the same distinction) |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::: Yeah, though I don't want people wasting effort duplicating things that could be hosted on Wikipedia. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 04:10, 21 June 2019 (UTC) |
:::: Yeah, though I don't want people wasting effort duplicating things that could be hosted on Wikipedia. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 04:10, 21 June 2019 (UTC) |
||
== Strategic nomination == |
|||
Removed "Vote-splitting is a special case of strategic nomination" because I don't see how that's true. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 13:50, 8 August 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:50, 8 August 2019
Merge
Vote-splitting and spoiler effect could probably be merged, but I consider them to be different scenarios, so ideally they'd be listed as separate things and explain what's similar and different about them. — Psephomancy (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- Please, keep them separated. Vote splitting is a separate concept, and the cause of spoiler effects. They should not be confused to one another. lucasvb (talk} 12:04, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- User:lucasvb Well we don't even have a spoiler effect article, so... — Psephomancy (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, though I don't want people wasting effort duplicating things that could be hosted on Wikipedia. — Psephomancy (talk) 04:10, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Strategic nomination
Removed "Vote-splitting is a special case of strategic nomination" because I don't see how that's true. — Psephomancy (talk) 13:50, 8 August 2019 (UTC)