Talk:Vote splitting: Difference between revisions

From electowiki
Content added Content deleted
m (Psephomancy moved page Talk:Split vote to Talk:Vote splitting: Wikipedia has the same distinction)
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


:::: Yeah, though I don't want people wasting effort duplicating things that could be hosted on Wikipedia. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 04:10, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
:::: Yeah, though I don't want people wasting effort duplicating things that could be hosted on Wikipedia. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 04:10, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

== Strategic nomination ==

Removed "Vote-splitting is a special case of strategic nomination" because I don't see how that's true. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 13:50, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:50, 8 August 2019

Merge

Vote-splitting and spoiler effect could probably be merged, but I consider them to be different scenarios, so ideally they'd be listed as separate things and explain what's similar and different about them. — Psephomancy (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Please, keep them separated. Vote splitting is a separate concept, and the cause of spoiler effects. They should not be confused to one another. lucasvb (talk} 12:04, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
User:lucasvb Well we don't even have a spoiler effect article, so... — Psephomancy (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Not yet! :) lucasvb (talk} 20:09, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Yeah, though I don't want people wasting effort duplicating things that could be hosted on Wikipedia. — Psephomancy (talk) 04:10, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Strategic nomination

Removed "Vote-splitting is a special case of strategic nomination" because I don't see how that's true. — Psephomancy (talk) 13:50, 8 August 2019 (UTC)