Total approval chain climbing: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Notes) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
(Full definition should be added) |
(Full definition should be added) |
||
Example: |
|||
34 A>B|>C |
|||
35 B|>C>A |
|||
31 C>A|>B |
|||
Approvals (using the [[approval threshold]] symbol "|") are A 65, B 69, C 31. C is added first into the chain because C has the lowest approval, and then B, not A, is added into the chain, because B is the only candidate who [[pairwise beat|pairwise beats]] C. A can't then be added in, because A can only beat B and not also C. Therefore, B is the winner. |
|||
== Notes == |
== Notes == |
||
Line 16: | Line 24: | ||
{{stub}} |
{{stub}} |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Smith-efficient Condorcet methods]] |
||
[[Category:Condorcet methods]] |
[[Category:Condorcet-cardinal hybrid methods]] |