Unanimous consensus criterion: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 19:42, 28 April 2006 (view source) imported>RamonLlull No edit summary		Revision as of 19:43, 28 April 2006 (view source) imported>RamonLlull (→‎Definition) Newer edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:
	An alternative that is consented by all voters is called a [[unanimous consensus winner]]. In a given election with two or more alternatives, there can exist more than one unanimous consensus winner. Voting systems that guarantee the election of a unanimous consensus winner must have a tie-breaking mechanism among multiple winners in order to be decisive.		An alternative that is consented by all voters is called a [[unanimous consensus winner]]. In a given election with two or more alternatives, there can exist more than one unanimous consensus winner. Voting systems that guarantee the election of a unanimous consensus winner must have a tie-breaking mechanism among multiple winners in order to be decisive.

	[[Approval voting]] and [[Llull ~~voting~~]] satisfy the unanimous consensus criterion. [[Condorcet methods]], [[Plurality voting]], [[IRV]], and the [[Borda count]] do not satisfy this criterion.		[[Approval voting]] and [[Llull Voting]] satisfy the unanimous consensus criterion. [[Condorcet methods]], [[Plurality voting]], [[IRV]], and the [[Borda count]] do not satisfy this criterion.