Unanimous consensus criterion: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
imported>RamonLlull No edit summary |
imported>RamonLlull |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
An alternative that is consented by all voters is called a [[unanimous consensus winner]]. In a given election with two or more alternatives, there can exist more than one unanimous consensus winner. Voting systems that guarantee the election of a unanimous consensus winner must have a tie-breaking mechanism among multiple winners in order to be decisive. |
An alternative that is consented by all voters is called a [[unanimous consensus winner]]. In a given election with two or more alternatives, there can exist more than one unanimous consensus winner. Voting systems that guarantee the election of a unanimous consensus winner must have a tie-breaking mechanism among multiple winners in order to be decisive. |
||
[[Approval voting]] and [[Llull |
[[Approval voting]] and [[Llull Voting]] satisfy the unanimous consensus criterion. [[Condorcet methods]], [[Plurality voting]], [[IRV]], and the [[Borda count]] do not satisfy this criterion. |
||
Revision as of 19:43, 28 April 2006
Definition
A voting system that guarantees the election of an alternative that is consented to by all voters in the voting population satisfies the unanimous consensus criterion.
An alternative that is consented by all voters is called a unanimous consensus winner. In a given election with two or more alternatives, there can exist more than one unanimous consensus winner. Voting systems that guarantee the election of a unanimous consensus winner must have a tie-breaking mechanism among multiple winners in order to be decisive.
Approval voting and Llull Voting satisfy the unanimous consensus criterion. Condorcet methods, Plurality voting, IRV, and the Borda count do not satisfy this criterion.