Uncovered set: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
!x |
!x |
||
!y |
!y |
||
| ⚫ | |||
!v |
!v |
||
| ⚫ | |||
!Copeland score |
!Copeland score |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|x |
|x |
||
| --- |
| --- |
||
| ⚫ | |||
|Win |
|Win |
||
|Lose |
|Lose |
||
| ⚫ | |||
|(2-1)=1 |
|(2-1)=1 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
|v |
|v |
||
|Win |
|Win |
||
| ⚫ | |||
|Lose |
|Lose |
||
| --- |
| --- |
||
| ⚫ | |||
|(1-2)=-1 |
|(1-2)=-1 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
|Lose |
|Lose |
||
|Lose |
|Lose |
||
| ⚫ | |||
|Win |
|Win |
||
| ⚫ | |||
|(1-2)=-1 |
|(1-2)=-1 |
||
|} |
|} |
||
Notice that the Smith set includes all candidates (this can be seen by observing that there is a [[beatpath]] of x>y>z>v>x). But the uncovered set is all candidates except z; this is because y>z and all candidates who beat y (just x) also beat z. <ref>https://economics.stackexchange.com/a/27691</ref> (Notice that the Copeland set is even smaller; it is just v and x). |
Notice that the Smith set includes all candidates (this can be seen by observing that there is a [[beatpath]] of x>y>z>v>x, or alternatively by observing that no matter how many candidates you look at from top to bottom, there is still some candidate outside of the group being looked at that one of the candidates in the group lose or tie to). But the uncovered set is all candidates except z; this is because y>z and all candidates who beat y (just x) also beat z. <ref>https://economics.stackexchange.com/a/27691</ref> (Notice that the Copeland set is even smaller; it is just v and x). |
||
== Notes == |
== Notes == |
||