User:Matijaskala/Probabilistic Approval Voting: Difference between revisions

From electowiki
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "Probabilistic Voting is a sequential proportional voting system that uses either approval or score ballots. Its winners are found by the use of probabilistic calculations. The...")
 
m (typo)
Line 2: Line 2:





Let's say that there is a function P: C×C -> [0,1] which returns the probability that two given candidates bolong to the same political faction. Then for a given candidate A the expected number of elected candidates belonging to the same faction equals <math display="inline">\sum_{X \in W} P(A,X)</math> and the expected average load of A's voters equals <math display="inline">\frac{\sum_{X \in W} P(A,X)}{V(A)}</math>. If A is not already elected then we can calculate the expected average load of A's voters after A's election as <math display="inline">\frac{1+\sum_{X \in W} P(A,X)}{V(A)}</math>. Let's call <math display="inline">\frac{V(A)}{1+\sum_{X \in W} P(A,X)}</math> A's score and <math display="inline">\frac{1+\sum_{X \in W}P(A,X)}{V(A)}</math> A's inverse score. If we keep electing candidates whose inverse score is at least as low as inverse hare quota then we can expect an outcome where each winner voters' expected average load is below a certain limit AKA a proportional outcome.
Let's say that there is a function P: C×C -> [0,1] which returns the probability that two given candidates belong to the same political faction. Then for a given candidate A the expected number of elected candidates belonging to the same faction equals <math display="inline">\sum_{X \in W} P(A,X)</math> and the expected average load of A's voters equals <math display="inline">\frac{\sum_{X \in W} P(A,X)}{V(A)}</math>. If A is not already elected then we can calculate the expected average load of A's voters after A's election as <math display="inline">\frac{1+\sum_{X \in W} P(A,X)}{V(A)}</math>. Let's call <math display="inline">\frac{V(A)}{1+\sum_{X \in W} P(A,X)}</math> A's score and <math display="inline">\frac{1+\sum_{X \in W}P(A,X)}{V(A)}</math> A's inverse score. If we keep electing candidates whose inverse score is at least as low as inverse hare quota then we can expect an outcome where each winner voters' expected average load is below a certain limit AKA a proportional outcome.





Revision as of 01:17, 5 February 2020

Probabilistic Voting is a sequential proportional voting system that uses either approval or score ballots. Its winners are found by the use of probabilistic calculations. The system is 2-level precint-summable.


Let's say that there is a function P: C×C -> [0,1] which returns the probability that two given candidates belong to the same political faction. Then for a given candidate A the expected number of elected candidates belonging to the same faction equals and the expected average load of A's voters equals . If A is not already elected then we can calculate the expected average load of A's voters after A's election as . Let's call A's score and A's inverse score. If we keep electing candidates whose inverse score is at least as low as inverse hare quota then we can expect an outcome where each winner voters' expected average load is below a certain limit AKA a proportional outcome.


In practice, electing a candidate whose inverse score is at least as low as inverse hare quota will not always be possible. In that case we need to either add failsafe approvals which we previously didn't consider or elect the candidate with the lowest inverse score and hope it is low enough.


A reasonable choice for P(A,B) would be which would give as the formula for the score of candidate A. In each step we elect the candidate with the highest score.


Probabilistic voting can be done with score ballots. We start by treating maximum score as approval. Once every candidate's score falls below hare quota we progressively add lower scores.