4,193
edits
User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy: Difference between revisions
→Building trust via proper introduction: - a few questions, and a request for a proper introduction
(→Building trust via proper introduction: - a few questions, and a request for a proper introduction) |
|||
Line 31:
: I fixed both of them. The images I would've liked to have uploaded within the section "Demonstrating pairwise counting" itself, rather than off to the right side, but it should work well enough. [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 20:20, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
== Building trust via proper introduction ==
[[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy]], I really appreciate that you have become the most active editor on this wiki. The changes that you make are ''probably'' correct. Though really, I don't have time to make sense of many of the edits you make. When I see the "Recent changes" on this wiki completely dominated by edits that I don't fully understand, it makes me distrust the changes. When I look at your user page (at [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy]], it doesn't build confidence.
If you'd like to remain anonymous, I can respect that. But I think the combination of anonymity and velocity is potentially toxic to a healthy wiki community. Note that I say "potentially toxic". We can make it work (e.g. just like English Wikipedia has), but I'd appreciate your help. Could you make a better user page that helps us trust you more? For example, is your Twitter handle @BetterVoting? Are you "AssetVotingAdvocacy" on [https://forum.electionscience.org/ The Election Science forum]? It's possible to build trust with an anonymous identity, but it requires a lot of work. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 22:22, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
| |||