Vote For and Against: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (Rename the criterion that the last preference of a majority can't be elected, the majority loser criterion) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
In the three-candidate case, VFA does satisfy the [[Mutual majority criterion|Majority criterion for solid coalitions]], and in one respect also Clone Independence: When the winner in a two-candidate race is ''cloned'', this cannot cause the loser of the two-candidate race to be elected. |
In the three-candidate case, VFA does satisfy the [[Mutual majority criterion|Majority criterion for solid coalitions]], and in one respect also Clone Independence: When the winner in a two-candidate race is ''cloned'', this cannot cause the loser of the two-candidate race to be elected. |
||
Although VFA performs rather poorly with respect to criteria, it is as easy to count as [[Plurality voting|First-Preference Plurality]] or [[Approval voting]], neither of which satisfies the ''Majority |
Although VFA performs rather poorly with respect to criteria, it is as easy to count as [[Plurality voting|First-Preference Plurality]] or [[Approval voting]], neither of which satisfies the ''Majority Loser criterion'' or (even in the three-candidate case) the [[Mutual majority criterion|Majority criterion for solid coalitions]]. |
||
==== Variant satisfying Participation ==== |
==== Variant satisfying Participation ==== |