Voting system criterion: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (unordered list) |
||
Line 3:
Examples for such criteria are:
* [[Consistency|Consistency criterion]]
▲:[[Consensus Criteria]]
▲:[[Favorite Betrayal criterion]]
:[[Generalized Strategy-Free criterion]]▼
▲:[[Greatest Possible Consensus Criterion]]
▲:[[Independence of irrelevant alternatives|independence from irrelevant alternatives]]
▲:[[Independence of irrelevant alternatives|local independence from irrelevant alternatives]]
▲:[[Tactical voting|invulnerability to burying]]
▲:[[Tactical voting|invulnerability to compromising]]
▲:[[Pareto criterion]]
▲:[[Participation criterion]]
▲:[[Plurality criterion]]
▲:[[Schwartz set|Schwartz criterion]]
▲:[[Smith set|Smith criterion]] (also known as [[Generalized Condorcet criterion]])
▲:[[Strategic nomination|Independence of clones]]
▲:[[Strategy-Free criterion]]
▲:[[Strong Defensive Strategy criterion]]
▲:[[Summability criterion]]
▲:[[Unanimous Consensus Criterion]]
[[Category:Voting_system_criteria|Voting system criteria]]
|
Revision as of 16:30, 4 October 2019
A formally defined pass/fail criterion by which a voting system may be assessed.
Examples for such criteria are:
- Condorcet criterion
- Consensus Criteria
- Consistency criterion
- Favorite Betrayal criterion
- Generalized Strategy-Free criterion
- Greatest Possible Consensus Criterion
- independence from irrelevant alternatives
- local independence from irrelevant alternatives
- invulnerability to burying
- invulnerability to compromising
- Later-no-harm criterion
- Monotonicity criterion
- Pareto criterion
- Participation criterion
- Plurality criterion
- Schwartz criterion
- Smith criterion (also known as Generalized Condorcet criterion)
- Independence of clones
- Strategy-Free criterion
- Strong Defensive Strategy criterion
- Summability criterion
- Unanimous Consensus Criterion
- Weak Defensive Strategy criterion
This page is a stub - please add to it.