2012 Occupy Wall Street polls: Difference between revisions

From electowiki
Content added Content deleted
VisualWikitext
((I meant exit poll) Add refs)
(add graphs for pilot)
Line 1: Line 1:
In 2012, the Politics and Electoral Reform Working Group of [[W:Occupy Wall Street|Occupy Wall Street]] conducted experimental surveys in New York City to investigate how voters behave under four different voting methods: [[First Past the Post electoral system|Plurality voting]], [[Approval voting]], [[Score voting]] (0-5), and [[Instant-runoff voting|Instant-Runoff Voting]] (with top-3 ballots).<ref name=":1">{{Cite news|title=Podcast 2013-05-27: Follow-up with Occupy Wall Street's TJ Frawls|url=https://electology.org/podcasts/2013-05-27_tj_frawls|work=The Center for Election Science|date=2015-05-25|access-date=2018-09-23|language=en}}</ref> The polls were taken using custom software on iPads.
In 2012, the Politics and Electoral Reform Working Group of [[W:Occupy Wall Street|Occupy Wall Street]] conducted experimental surveys in New York City to investigate how voters behave under four different voting methods: [[First Past the Post electoral system|Plurality voting]], [[Approval voting]], [[Score voting]] (0-5), and [[Instant-runoff voting|Instant-Runoff Voting]] (with a maximum of 3 rankings).<ref name=":1">{{Cite news|title=Podcast 2013-05-27: Follow-up with Occupy Wall Street's TJ Frawls|url=https://electology.org/podcasts/2013-05-27_tj_frawls|work=The Center for Election Science|date=2015-05-25|access-date=2018-09-23|language=en}}</ref> The polls were taken using custom software on iPads.


== Preliminary pilot study ==
== Preliminary pilot study ==
They first polled 316 people at Occupy protest sites and events around Manhattan, in the spring of 2012, to test the software and people's reactions.<ref name=":1" />
They first polled 316 people at Occupy protest sites and events around Manhattan, in the spring of 2012, to test the software and people's reactions.<ref name=":1" /> In this poll, voters selected a candidate under Plurality voting, and then were randomly assigned two of the other voting systems.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|url=https://electology.org/sites/default/files/Full%20Report.pdf|title=Make Voting Count: an Experiment in Alternative Voting Methods|date=March 2013|access-date=|website=|last=|first=|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|publisher=Politics and Electoral Reform Working Group}}</ref>

In this poll, voters selected a candidate under Plurality voting, and then were randomly assigned two of the other voting systems.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|url=https://electology.org/sites/default/files/Full%20Report.pdf|title=Make Voting Count: an Experiment in Alternative Voting Methods|date=March 2013|access-date=|website=|last=|first=|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|publisher=Politics and Electoral Reform Working Group}}</ref>


The poll asked "If this year's elections were held today, what party's candidates would you favor?" with this list of candidates:<ref name=":2" />
The poll asked "If this year's elections were held today, what party's candidates would you favor?" with this list of candidates:<ref name=":2" />
Line 14: Line 12:
* Socialist Party
* Socialist Party
* A write-in option
* A write-in option

No adjustment was made to correct for the unrepresentativeness of the voters; who were primarily OWS participants;<ref name=":2" /> it was just to compare voting behavior under different systems.<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|title=Podcast 2012-08-20: Interview with Occupy Wall Street’s TJ Frawls on Electoral System Pilot Poll|url=https://electology.org/podcasts/2012-08-20_tj_rawls|work=The Center for Election Science|date=2015-05-25|access-date=2018-09-23|language=en}}</ref>
No adjustment was made to correct for the unrepresentativeness of the voters; who were primarily OWS participants;<ref name=":2" /> it was just to compare voting behavior under different systems.<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|title=Podcast 2012-08-20: Interview with Occupy Wall Street’s TJ Frawls on Electoral System Pilot Poll|url=https://electology.org/podcasts/2012-08-20_tj_rawls|work=The Center for Election Science|date=2015-05-25|access-date=2018-09-23|language=en}}</ref>


The Democratic Party won the plurality election by a small margin, with a total of 35% of the votes. The Green Party won under the other 3 methods.
The votes were tallied by hand, and it was much easier to tally the Approval and Score votes than the Instant-Runoff votes (which required 13 elimination rounds to find a winner).<ref name=":0" />

Support for third parties was much higher under the cardinal systems compared to Plurality, moving the Democratic party down to 4th place:<ref name=":2" />

{{Graph:Chart|width=600|height=400
|xAxisTitle=Candidate|yAxisTitle=Votes (% of possible)|legend=Legend|type=rect
|y1Title=Plurality
|y2Title=Approval
|y3Title=Score
|x=Democratic, Green, Independent, Socialist, Libertarian, Republican, Write-in
|y1=34.80, 23.10, 16.50, 7.60, 3.16, 2.53, 12.34
|y2=48.07, 74.00, 72.10, 60.57, 27.88, 4.33, 10.58
|y3=51.01, 68.88, 59.90, 58.51, 34.17, 12.31, 11.2
}}

⚫
The first preferences for the IRV election were similar to the plurality election:<ref name=":2" />

{{Graph:Chart|width=600|height=400
|xAxisTitle=Candidate|yAxisTitle=Votes (% of possible)|legend=Legend|type=rect
|y1Title=Plurality
|y2Title=IRV (first preferences)
|x=Democratic, Green, Independent, Socialist, Libertarian, Republican, Write-in
|y1=34.80, 23.10, 16.50, 7.60, 3.16, 2.53, 12.34
|y2=31.25, 26.92, 17.78, 11.53, 2.88, 0.01, 8.17
}}

Since no one obtained a majority in the first round, the IRV election proceeded through 13 elimination rounds to find a winner, which was the Green Party. <!-- Though I'm skeptical that they did this correctly; see talk page. -->


The Democratic Party won the plurality election by a small margin, with a total of 35% of the votes. The Green Party won under the other 3 methods.<ref name=":2" />
The votes were tallied by hand, and the organizers found it much easier to tally the Approval and Score votes than the Instant-Runoff votes.<ref name=":0" />


== Exit poll ==
== Exit poll ==
Line 32: Line 57:
* Write-in option
* Write-in option


No adjustment was made to correct for the unrepresentativeness of the district, though polling only took place in a single district, so that the poll's plurality results could be compared with the results of the actual plurality election in that district. The results were similar for both:<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" />
No adjustment was made to correct for the unrepresentativeness of the district, though polling only took place in a single district, so that the poll's plurality results could be compared with the results of the actual plurality election in that district. The plurality results were similar for both:<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" />


{{Graph:Chart|width=600|height=400
{{Graph:Chart|width=600|height=400
Line 42: Line 67:
|y2=85.01, 8.28, 3.16, 1.78, 0.99, 0.39, 0.20,
|y2=85.01, 8.28, 3.16, 1.78, 0.99, 0.39, 0.20,
}}
}}



Obama easily won under all 4 voting systems, though Approval and Score showed that there was much higher support for third parties than traditional plurality elections would imply. Romney's position in the overall ranking dropped from second place to last place under the cardinal systems:<ref name=":2" />
Obama easily won under all 4 voting systems, though Approval and Score showed that there was much higher support for third parties than traditional plurality elections would imply. Romney's position in the overall ranking dropped from second place to last place under the cardinal systems:<ref name=":2" />
Line 56: Line 82:
}}
}}



⚫
Obama won the IRV election without any elimination rounds necessary. The first preferences for the IRV election were similar to the plurality election:<ref name=":2" />
The first preferences for the IRV election were similar to the plurality election. Obama won the IRV election without any elimination rounds necessary, so second and third preferences (which favored the Green Party) were ignored:<ref name=":2" />


{{Graph:Chart|width=600|height=400
{{Graph:Chart|width=600|height=400
Line 66: Line 93:
|y2=83.8, 8.5, 3.9, 1.4, 1.2, 1.2, 0.2
|y2=83.8, 8.5, 3.9, 1.4, 1.2, 1.2, 0.2
}}
}}





Revision as of 17:20, 23 September 2018

In 2012, the Politics and Electoral Reform Working Group of Occupy Wall Street conducted experimental surveys in New York City to investigate how voters behave under four different voting methods: Plurality voting, Approval voting, Score voting (0-5), and Instant-Runoff Voting (with a maximum of 3 rankings).[1] The polls were taken using custom software on iPads.

Preliminary pilot study

They first polled 316 people at Occupy protest sites and events around Manhattan, in the spring of 2012, to test the software and people's reactions.[1] In this poll, voters selected a candidate under Plurality voting, and then were randomly assigned two of the other voting systems.[2]

The poll asked "If this year's elections were held today, what party's candidates would you favor?" with this list of candidates:[2]

  • Democratic Party
  • Green Party
  • Independent candidates
  • Republican Party
  • Libertarian Party
  • Socialist Party
  • A write-in option

No adjustment was made to correct for the unrepresentativeness of the voters; who were primarily OWS participants;[2] it was just to compare voting behavior under different systems.[3]

The Democratic Party won the plurality election by a small margin, with a total of 35% of the votes. The Green Party won under the other 3 methods.

Support for third parties was much higher under the cardinal systems compared to Plurality, moving the Democratic party down to 4th place:[2]

<graph>{"legends":[{"stroke":"color","title":"Legend","fill":"color"}],"scales":[{"type":"ordinal","name":"x","zero":false,"domain":{"data":"chart","field":"x"},"padding":0.2,"range":"width","nice":true},{"type":"linear","name":"y","domain":{"data":"chart","field":"y"},"zero":true,"range":"height","nice":true},{"domain":{"data":"chart","field":"series"},"type":"ordinal","name":"color","range":"category10"}],"version":2,"marks":[{"type":"group","from":{"data":"chart","transform":[{"groupby":"x","type":"facet"}]},"properties":{"enter":{"width":{"scale":"x","band":true},"x":{"scale":"x","field":"key"}}},"marks":[{"properties":{"hover":{"fill":{"value":"red"}},"update":{"fill":{"scale":"color","field":"series"}},"enter":{"y":{"scale":"y","field":"y"},"x":{"scale":"series","field":"series"},"y2":{"scale":"y","value":0},"width":{"scale":"series","offset":-1,"band":true},"fill":{"scale":"color","field":"series"}}},"type":"rect"}],"scales":[{"domain":{"field":"series"},"type":"ordinal","name":"series","range":"width"}]}],"height":400,"axes":[{"scale":"x","type":"x","title":"Candidate"},{"scale":"y","type":"y","title":"Votes (% of possible)"}],"data":[{"format":{"parse":{"y":"number","x":"string"},"type":"json"},"name":"chart","values":[{"y":34.8,"series":"Plurality","x":"Democratic"},{"y":23.1,"series":"Plurality","x":"Green"},{"y":16.5,"series":"Plurality","x":"Independent"},{"y":7.6,"series":"Plurality","x":"Socialist"},{"y":3.16,"series":"Plurality","x":"Libertarian"},{"y":2.53,"series":"Plurality","x":"Republican"},{"y":12.34,"series":"Plurality","x":"Write-in"},{"y":48.07,"series":"Approval","x":"Democratic"},{"y":74,"series":"Approval","x":"Green"},{"y":72.1,"series":"Approval","x":"Independent"},{"y":60.57,"series":"Approval","x":"Socialist"},{"y":27.88,"series":"Approval","x":"Libertarian"},{"y":4.33,"series":"Approval","x":"Republican"},{"y":10.58,"series":"Approval","x":"Write-in"},{"y":51.01,"series":"Score","x":"Democratic"},{"y":68.88,"series":"Score","x":"Green"},{"y":59.9,"series":"Score","x":"Independent"},{"y":58.51,"series":"Score","x":"Socialist"},{"y":34.17,"series":"Score","x":"Libertarian"},{"y":12.31,"series":"Score","x":"Republican"},{"y":11.2,"series":"Score","x":"Write-in"}]}],"width":600}</graph>

The first preferences for the IRV election were similar to the plurality election:[2]

<graph>{"legends":[{"stroke":"color","title":"Legend","fill":"color"}],"scales":[{"type":"ordinal","name":"x","zero":false,"domain":{"data":"chart","field":"x"},"padding":0.2,"range":"width","nice":true},{"type":"linear","name":"y","domain":{"data":"chart","field":"y"},"zero":true,"range":"height","nice":true},{"domain":{"data":"chart","field":"series"},"type":"ordinal","name":"color","range":"category10"}],"version":2,"marks":[{"type":"group","from":{"data":"chart","transform":[{"groupby":"x","type":"facet"}]},"properties":{"enter":{"width":{"scale":"x","band":true},"x":{"scale":"x","field":"key"}}},"marks":[{"properties":{"hover":{"fill":{"value":"red"}},"update":{"fill":{"scale":"color","field":"series"}},"enter":{"y":{"scale":"y","field":"y"},"x":{"scale":"series","field":"series"},"y2":{"scale":"y","value":0},"width":{"scale":"series","offset":-1,"band":true},"fill":{"scale":"color","field":"series"}}},"type":"rect"}],"scales":[{"domain":{"field":"series"},"type":"ordinal","name":"series","range":"width"}]}],"height":400,"axes":[{"scale":"x","type":"x","title":"Candidate"},{"scale":"y","type":"y","title":"Votes (% of possible)"}],"data":[{"format":{"parse":{"y":"number","x":"string"},"type":"json"},"name":"chart","values":[{"y":34.8,"series":"Plurality","x":"Democratic"},{"y":23.1,"series":"Plurality","x":"Green"},{"y":16.5,"series":"Plurality","x":"Independent"},{"y":7.6,"series":"Plurality","x":"Socialist"},{"y":3.16,"series":"Plurality","x":"Libertarian"},{"y":2.53,"series":"Plurality","x":"Republican"},{"y":12.34,"series":"Plurality","x":"Write-in"},{"y":31.25,"series":"IRV (first preferences)","x":"Democratic"},{"y":26.92,"series":"IRV (first preferences)","x":"Green"},{"y":17.78,"series":"IRV (first preferences)","x":"Independent"},{"y":11.53,"series":"IRV (first preferences)","x":"Socialist"},{"y":2.88,"series":"IRV (first preferences)","x":"Libertarian"},{"y":0.01,"series":"IRV (first preferences)","x":"Republican"},{"y":8.17,"series":"IRV (first preferences)","x":"Write-in"}]}],"width":600}</graph>

Since no one obtained a majority in the first round, the IRV election proceeded through 13 elimination rounds to find a winner, which was the Green Party.

The votes were tallied by hand, and the organizers found it much easier to tally the Approval and Score votes than the Instant-Runoff votes.[3]

Exit poll

On Election Day, November 6, 2012, they polled 507 voters in Manhattan's left-leaning 69th Assembly District. In this poll, every voter participated in all 4 voting systems.[2]

The candidates were the same as those in the real election:[1]

  • Barack Obama (Democratic Party)
  • Mitt Romney (Republican Party)
  • Jill Stein (Green Party)
  • Peta Lindsay (Socialism and Liberation Party)
  • Gary Johnson (Libertarian)
  • Virgil Goode (Constitution Party)
  • Write-in option

No adjustment was made to correct for the unrepresentativeness of the district, though polling only took place in a single district, so that the poll's plurality results could be compared with the results of the actual plurality election in that district. The plurality results were similar for both:[1][2]

<graph>{"legends":[{"stroke":"color","title":"Legend","fill":"color"}],"scales":[{"type":"ordinal","name":"x","zero":false,"domain":{"data":"chart","field":"x"},"padding":0.2,"range":"width","nice":true},{"type":"linear","name":"y","domain":{"data":"chart","field":"y"},"zero":true,"range":"height","nice":true},{"domain":{"data":"chart","field":"series"},"type":"ordinal","name":"color","range":"category10"}],"version":2,"marks":[{"type":"group","from":{"data":"chart","transform":[{"groupby":"x","type":"facet"}]},"properties":{"enter":{"width":{"scale":"x","band":true},"x":{"scale":"x","field":"key"}}},"marks":[{"properties":{"hover":{"fill":{"value":"red"}},"update":{"fill":{"scale":"color","field":"series"}},"enter":{"y":{"scale":"y","field":"y"},"x":{"scale":"series","field":"series"},"y2":{"scale":"y","value":0},"width":{"scale":"series","offset":-1,"band":true},"fill":{"scale":"color","field":"series"}}},"type":"rect"}],"scales":[{"domain":{"field":"series"},"type":"ordinal","name":"series","range":"width"}]}],"height":400,"axes":[{"scale":"x","type":"x","title":"Candidate"},{"scale":"y","type":"y","title":"Votes (% of possible)"}],"data":[{"format":{"parse":{"y":"number","x":"string"},"type":"json"},"name":"chart","values":[{"y":88.9,"series":"Actual election","x":"Obama"},{"y":9.6,"series":"Actual election","x":"Romney"},{"y":0.81,"series":"Actual election","x":"Stein"},{"y":0.48,"series":"Actual election","x":"Johnson"},{"y":0.04,"series":"Actual election","x":"Lindsay"},{"y":0.03,"series":"Actual election","x":"Goode"},{"y":0.13,"series":"Actual election","x":"Write-in"},{"y":85.01,"series":"OWS exit poll","x":"Obama"},{"y":8.28,"series":"OWS exit poll","x":"Romney"},{"y":3.16,"series":"OWS exit poll","x":"Stein"},{"y":1.78,"series":"OWS exit poll","x":"Johnson"},{"y":0.99,"series":"OWS exit poll","x":"Lindsay"},{"y":0.39,"series":"OWS exit poll","x":"Goode"},{"y":0.2,"series":"OWS exit poll","x":"Write-in"}]}],"width":600}</graph>


Obama easily won under all 4 voting systems, though Approval and Score showed that there was much higher support for third parties than traditional plurality elections would imply. Romney's position in the overall ranking dropped from second place to last place under the cardinal systems:[2]

<graph>{"legends":[{"stroke":"color","title":"Legend","fill":"color"}],"scales":[{"type":"ordinal","name":"x","zero":false,"domain":{"data":"chart","field":"x"},"padding":0.2,"range":"width","nice":true},{"type":"linear","name":"y","domain":{"data":"chart","field":"y"},"zero":true,"range":"height","nice":true},{"domain":{"data":"chart","field":"series"},"type":"ordinal","name":"color","range":"category10"}],"version":2,"marks":[{"type":"group","from":{"data":"chart","transform":[{"groupby":"x","type":"facet"}]},"properties":{"enter":{"width":{"scale":"x","band":true},"x":{"scale":"x","field":"key"}}},"marks":[{"properties":{"hover":{"fill":{"value":"red"}},"update":{"fill":{"scale":"color","field":"series"}},"enter":{"y":{"scale":"y","field":"y"},"x":{"scale":"series","field":"series"},"y2":{"scale":"y","value":0},"width":{"scale":"series","offset":-1,"band":true},"fill":{"scale":"color","field":"series"}}},"type":"rect"}],"scales":[{"domain":{"field":"series"},"type":"ordinal","name":"series","range":"width"}]}],"height":400,"axes":[{"scale":"x","type":"x","title":"Candidate"},{"scale":"y","type":"y","title":"Votes (% of possible)"}],"data":[{"format":{"parse":{"y":"number","x":"string"},"type":"json"},"name":"chart","values":[{"y":85.01,"series":"Plurality","x":"Obama"},{"y":8.28,"series":"Plurality","x":"Romney"},{"y":3.16,"series":"Plurality","x":"Stein"},{"y":1.78,"series":"Plurality","x":"Johnson"},{"y":0.99,"series":"Plurality","x":"Lindsay"},{"y":0.39,"series":"Plurality","x":"Goode"},{"y":0.2,"series":"Plurality","x":"Write-in"},{"y":89.9,"series":"Approval","x":"Obama"},{"y":13,"series":"Approval","x":"Romney"},{"y":51.9,"series":"Approval","x":"Stein"},{"y":26.8,"series":"Approval","x":"Johnson"},{"y":31.2,"series":"Approval","x":"Lindsay"},{"y":16.6,"series":"Approval","x":"Goode"},{"y":2.2,"series":"Approval","x":"Write-in"},{"y":86.3,"series":"Score","x":"Obama"},{"y":24.9,"series":"Score","x":"Romney"},{"y":53.9,"series":"Score","x":"Stein"},{"y":38.9,"series":"Score","x":"Johnson"},{"y":42.1,"series":"Score","x":"Lindsay"},{"y":33.5,"series":"Score","x":"Goode"},{"y":1.7,"series":"Score","x":"Write-in"}]}],"width":600}</graph>


The first preferences for the IRV election were similar to the plurality election. Obama won the IRV election without any elimination rounds necessary, so second and third preferences (which favored the Green Party) were ignored:[2]

<graph>{"legends":[{"stroke":"color","title":"Legend","fill":"color"}],"scales":[{"type":"ordinal","name":"x","zero":false,"domain":{"data":"chart","field":"x"},"padding":0.2,"range":"width","nice":true},{"type":"linear","name":"y","domain":{"data":"chart","field":"y"},"zero":true,"range":"height","nice":true},{"domain":{"data":"chart","field":"series"},"type":"ordinal","name":"color","range":"category10"}],"version":2,"marks":[{"type":"group","from":{"data":"chart","transform":[{"groupby":"x","type":"facet"}]},"properties":{"enter":{"width":{"scale":"x","band":true},"x":{"scale":"x","field":"key"}}},"marks":[{"properties":{"hover":{"fill":{"value":"red"}},"update":{"fill":{"scale":"color","field":"series"}},"enter":{"y":{"scale":"y","field":"y"},"x":{"scale":"series","field":"series"},"y2":{"scale":"y","value":0},"width":{"scale":"series","offset":-1,"band":true},"fill":{"scale":"color","field":"series"}}},"type":"rect"}],"scales":[{"domain":{"field":"series"},"type":"ordinal","name":"series","range":"width"}]}],"height":400,"axes":[{"scale":"x","type":"x","title":"Candidate"},{"scale":"y","type":"y","title":"Votes (% of possible)"}],"data":[{"format":{"parse":{"y":"number","x":"string"},"type":"json"},"name":"chart","values":[{"y":85.01,"series":"Plurality","x":"Obama"},{"y":8.28,"series":"Plurality","x":"Romney"},{"y":3.16,"series":"Plurality","x":"Stein"},{"y":1.78,"series":"Plurality","x":"Johnson"},{"y":0.99,"series":"Plurality","x":"Lindsay"},{"y":0.39,"series":"Plurality","x":"Goode"},{"y":0.2,"series":"Plurality","x":"Write-in"},{"y":83.8,"series":"IRV (first preferences)","x":"Obama"},{"y":8.5,"series":"IRV (first preferences)","x":"Romney"},{"y":3.9,"series":"IRV (first preferences)","x":"Stein"},{"y":1.4,"series":"IRV (first preferences)","x":"Johnson"},{"y":1.2,"series":"IRV (first preferences)","x":"Lindsay"},{"y":1.2,"series":"IRV (first preferences)","x":"Goode"},{"y":0.2,"series":"IRV (first preferences)","x":"Write-in"}]}],"width":600}</graph>


In the IRV election, 29% bullet-voted for only one candidate, while the others selected two or three candidates (the maximum allowed):[2]

<graph>{"legends":[],"scales":[{"type":"ordinal","name":"x","zero":false,"domain":{"data":"chart","field":"x"},"padding":0.2,"range":"width","nice":true},{"type":"linear","name":"y","domain":{"data":"chart","field":"y"},"zero":true,"range":"height","nice":true},{"domain":{"data":"chart","field":"series"},"type":"ordinal","name":"color","range":"category10"}],"version":2,"marks":[{"type":"rect","properties":{"hover":{"fill":{"value":"red"}},"update":{"fill":{"scale":"color","field":"series"}},"enter":{"y":{"scale":"y","field":"y"},"x":{"scale":"x","field":"x"},"y2":{"scale":"y","value":0},"width":{"scale":"x","offset":-1,"band":true},"fill":{"scale":"color","field":"series"}}},"from":{"data":"chart"}},{"type":"text","properties":{"enter":{"baseline":{"value":"middle"},"align":{"value":"right"},"text":{"template":"{{datum.y|number:'.2r'}}"},"y":{"scale":"y","offset":4,"field":"y"},"dy":{"scale":"x","mult":0.5,"band":true},"x":{"scale":"x","field":"x"},"angle":{"value":-90},"fontSize":{"value":11},"fill":{"value":"white"}}},"from":{"data":"chart"}}],"height":150,"axes":[{"scale":"x","type":"x","title":"Number of candidates ranked","format":"d"},{"scale":"y","type":"y","title":"Voters (%)"}],"data":[{"format":{"parse":{"y":"number","x":"integer"},"type":"json"},"name":"chart","values":[{"y":29.2,"series":"y","x":1},{"y":12.4,"series":"y","x":2},{"y":58.4,"series":"y","x":3}]}],"width":200}</graph>

References

  1. ↑ a b c d "Podcast 2013-05-27: Follow-up with Occupy Wall Street's TJ Frawls". The Center for Election Science. 2015-05-25. Retrieved 2018-09-23.
  2. ↑ a b c d e f g h i j "Make Voting Count: an Experiment in Alternative Voting Methods" (PDF). Politics and Electoral Reform Working Group. March 2013.
  3. ↑ a b "Podcast 2012-08-20: Interview with Occupy Wall Street's TJ Frawls on Electoral System Pilot Poll". The Center for Election Science. 2015-05-25. Retrieved 2018-09-23.

http://manhattanlp.org/occupy-wall-streets-tj-frawley-on-how-to-fix-the-us-electoral-system/

http://web.archive.org/web/20130728110015/http://www.paercom.net/downloads/files/Press%20Release.pdf

Retrieved from "https://electowiki.org/wiki/2012_Occupy_Wall_Street_polls?oldid=5044"