Arrow's impossibility theorem: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Rephrased to make more clear that normalization is not necessarily strategic, by moving strategic voting to a separate paragraph.) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 22:
==Statement==
No [[Ordinal Voting|ordinal voting]] system can be designed that always satisfies these three "fairness" criteria:
#[[Pareto Criterion]]
#[[Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives]]
Line 52:
In addition, if the voters [[Strategic voting|vote strategically]], the first benefit is also lost.
==See also==
|