Chicken dilemma: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Point out the relation between the chicken dilemma and the criterion named after it, and fix some grammar.) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
ICT, [[Symmetrical ICT]], [[MMPO]], MDDTR, [[IRV]], [[Benham's Method|Benham's method]], [[Woodall's method]] |
ICT, [[Symmetrical ICT]], [[MMPO]], MDDTR, [[IRV]], [[Benham's Method|Benham's method]], [[Woodall's method]] |
||
== Notes == |
|||
One direct implication of the chicken dilemma criterion is a spoiler effect. This is because if A drops out of the race, then B becomes a majority's 1st choice and wins in any majority criterion-passing method. Further, there is also usually incentive for Favorite Betrayal, since A-top voters generally benefit from putting B 1st. That would be the case in IRV for: |
|||
26 A>B |
|||
25 B |
|||
49 C |
|||
If two A-top voters instead vote B-top, B wins instead of C. |
|||
Most advocates of the CD criterion would likely counter that it's a more common issue to encounter CD-type scenarios because of strategic voting rather than honest voting, therefore these are worthy prices to pay for the strategic resistance. |
|||
[[Category:Voting system criteria]] |
[[Category:Voting system criteria]] |