Information for "Condorcet PR"

Basic information

Display titleCondorcet PR
Default sort keyCondorcet PR
Page length (in bytes)10,239
Namespace ID0
Page ID1774
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Counted as a content pageYes
Number of subpages of this page0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
DeleteAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorBetterVotingAdvocacy (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation18:34, 21 February 2020
Latest editorBetterVotingAdvocacy (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit08:19, 23 April 2020
Total number of edits15
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

SEO properties



Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
Condorcet PR is a term that currently encompasses (at most) all voting methods that reduce to a Condorcet method in the single-winner case. There is no general agreement on how to further specify the category, though most would likely agree that some multi-winner voting methods are not proportional in any meaningful sense (such as Bloc Ranked Pairs), and thus do not qualify to be Condorcet PR methods.[1] Further, many would likely argue that PSC, probably Droop-PSC, is a must. Generally, most discussions of "Condorcet PR" methods are about CPO-STV and Schulze STV.
Information from Extension:WikiSEO