Coombs' method: Difference between revisions

From electowiki
Content added Content deleted
(Added some links based on reddit discussion)
(Providing an #Example, and linking to Rob LeGrand's voting calculator and linking to a Felsenthal/Tideman paper)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Wikipedia}}
{{Wikipedia}}
'''Coombs' method''' (or the '''Coombs rule''')<ref>Grofman, Bernard, and Scott L. Feld (2004) [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2003.08.001 "If you like the alternative vote (a.k.a. the instant runoff), then you ought to know about the Coombs rule,"] ''Electoral Studies'' '''23''':641-59.</ref> is a [[ranked voting systems|ranked voting system]] created by [[wikipedia:Clyde Coombs|Clyde Coombs]] used for single-winner [[election]]s. Similarly to [[instant-runoff voting]], it uses candidate elimination and redistribution of votes cast for that candidate until one candidate has a majority of votes.
'''Coombs' method''' (or the '''Coombs rule''')<ref>Grofman, Bernard, and Scott L. Feld (2004) [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2003.08.001 "If you like the alternative vote (a.k.a. the instant runoff), then you ought to know about the Coombs rule,"] ''Electoral Studies'' '''23''':641-59.</ref> is a [[ranked voting systems|ranked voting system]] created by [[wikipedia:Clyde Coombs|Clyde Coombs]] used for single-winner [[election]]s. Similarly to [[instant-runoff voting]], it uses candidate elimination and redistribution of votes cast for that candidate until one candidate has a majority of votes.

==Example ==

Coombs' method frequently selects the [[Condorcet winner criterion|Condorcet winner]]. However, this does not always happen. For example:

7:a>c>d>b
6:a>d>b>c
3:b>a>c>d
7:b>c>a>d
9:b>c>d>a
4:c>a>d>b
6:d>a>b>c
3:a>c>b>d

This example, placed in [https://cs.angelo.edu/~rlegrand/rbvote/calc.html Rob LeGrand's voting calculator], shows that Coombs arrives at a different result than Condorcet. The example is pulled from a Felsenthal and Tideman paper.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Felsenthal |first=Dan |last2=Tideman |first2=Nicolaus |date=2013 |title=Varieties of failure of monotonicity and participation under five voting methods |url=https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dan-Felsenthal/publication/257667897_Varieties_of_failure_of_monotonicity_and_participation_under_five_voting_methods/links/54aec0fb0cf21670b35870a6/Varieties-of-failure-of-monotonicity-and-participation-under-five-voting-methods.pdf?origin=publication_detail|journal=Theory and Decision |language=en |volume=75 |issue=1 |pages=59–77}}</ref>



==Links==
==Links==


* 1996
*1996
** http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/1996-March/thread.html#65497 - "'Spokane' method"
**http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/1996-March/thread.html#65497 - "'Spokane' method"
* 2005
*2005
** https://web.archive.org/web/20050909092356/http://condorcet.org/emr/methods.shtml#Coombs - 2005 archive of Condorcet.org glossary of terminology
**https://web.archive.org/web/20050909092356/http://condorcet.org/emr/methods.shtml#Coombs - 2005 archive of Condorcet.org glossary of terminology
* 2019
*2019
** https://imgur.com/gallery/SLTHgCO - Diagram of Coombs' and [[center squeeze]]
**https://imgur.com/gallery/SLTHgCO - Diagram of Coombs' and [[center squeeze]]
* 2020
*2020
** https://www.reddit.com/r/EndFPTP/comments/js1qlt/wouldnt_a_rcv_method_where_you_eliminated_the/
**https://www.reddit.com/r/EndFPTP/comments/js1qlt/wouldnt_a_rcv_method_where_you_eliminated_the/


== Footnotes ==
==Footnotes==
<references/>
<references />


{{fromwikipedia}}
{{fromwikipedia}}

Revision as of 06:15, 20 October 2022

Wikipedia has an article on:

Coombs' method (or the Coombs rule)[1] is a ranked voting system created by Clyde Coombs used for single-winner elections. Similarly to instant-runoff voting, it uses candidate elimination and redistribution of votes cast for that candidate until one candidate has a majority of votes.

Example

Coombs' method frequently selects the Condorcet winner. However, this does not always happen. For example:

7:a>c>d>b
6:a>d>b>c
3:b>a>c>d
7:b>c>a>d
9:b>c>d>a
4:c>a>d>b
6:d>a>b>c
3:a>c>b>d

This example, placed in Rob LeGrand's voting calculator, shows that Coombs arrives at a different result than Condorcet. The example is pulled from a Felsenthal and Tideman paper.[2]


Links

Footnotes

  1. Grofman, Bernard, and Scott L. Feld (2004) "If you like the alternative vote (a.k.a. the instant runoff), then you ought to know about the Coombs rule," Electoral Studies 23:641-59.
  2. Felsenthal, Dan; Tideman, Nicolaus (2013). "Varieties of failure of monotonicity and participation under five voting methods" (PDF). Theory and Decision. 75 (1): 59–77.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).